Stay up to dateThere is continually more information, research and news that we can use to educate ourselves so we can win this fight. ArchivesCategories |
Back to Blog
What I Wanted to Say10/7/2024 Peculiar Board of Aldermen
October 7, 2024 Mr. Mayor, Members of the Board and City Staff, Thank you for allowing me to speak to you all this evening. I would like to use this time to discuss what has happened to our community over the last few months, the damage that it has caused and ideas on how we can all move forward together toward a better future for all of us. I would like to start by accurately describing our community. We all are members of a shared community that is much larger than just what lies inside city limits. Decisions that are made by this board have lasting effects on people well outside of just the city limits. Our community consists of the city of Peculiar, the city of Raymore and the residents of unincorporated north Cass County. What makes this our shared community is the school district. All of our children go to school together and have for quite some time. Now that I have described what I believe to be our greater community, I would like to talk about the different political entities within this. For starters, we have this board, the Raymore City Council, the County Commissioners, the school board, South Metro and West Peculiar fire districts. These groups all have competing interests but make decisions that affect all of us and because of this, they all have a responsibility to not only their smaller political subdivisions but the greatest good of the community. All of this leads me to what has gone on over the last year or so. Over a year ago, big tech came to Peculiar. The city was approached by a developer with one goal. That goal was to make as much money as possible for themselves and their client. A client that was never disclosed. This developer did not have the best interest of the community at heart. I am also greatly disappointed in not only this company but their parent company. They are a KC area company. This company used predatory business tactics, obscured and hid the truth. This is the same story that has been played out in small towns across the country. What do they look for? Power, water, fiber, loose zoning regulations and cities in financial need. Why are they looking for these things? To make money. Big Tech is a multi-trillion-dollar industry. In fact, Alphabet aka Google is worth over 2 trillion while Amazon sits at just over 1.9 trillion and Meta sits at a meager 1.5 trillion. They can afford to build all of these things away from people with their own power sources but that would lower their profits. Profit margins are all they care about. This company did not act alone, however, and one need not look too hard to find that the KCDAC has in fact been laying the groundwork for years. If you go back and look over the Board of Aldermen minutes of this city you can find evidence going back to at least 2018 where the KCDAC was working with this city to change tax policy. In fact, recommending the term 'tax incentive' be used instead of 'abatements.' You can change happy to glad, but it means the same thing. In this case, publicly funding multi trillion-dollar companies. Keep in mind of who is on the KCDAC. This council exists to promote and help big business. Once this predatory developer came to town, what happened next? The community was divided. Again, this is happening across the country with this industry as they do not care about the wake of destruction, or the collateral damage caused to communities. They only care about profit. We witnessed some of that division at the last board meeting. Mr. Mayor, I promise you that there are far more than 20 people against this project and they are not getting all of their information on Facebook. My wife and I have done a great deal of research. My wife has spoken to several people who live near data centers. One of whom is a county commissioner in Northern Virginia who regrets his decision to allow data centers to take over his community. So, where are we now? Now we have a divided community and public trust between the people and city is broken. Except for the Aldermen, people do not trust this city. Trust is a funny thing as it is hard to earn yet easy to break. Once trust is broken it is even harder to regain. In this case the question must be asked can the trust be regained? If so, how do we do it? I for one believe that public trust can be regained but it comes at a cost. Mr. Mayor, for you to regain any semblance of public trust you must first acknowledge your part in all of this. This evening you did take a step in that direction when you apologized for your behavior at the last Board of Aldermen meeting. This is only a start, however, as when the city needed to hear from you, it heard silence. You made no public statements, that I am aware of, from June 17, 2024 until your outburst at the last board meeting. You then followed that up with your Facebook post where you gaslit everyone who is against this deal. Given the fact that you have sat up there on multiple occasions and tried to hold others accountable for what they have posted on Facebook, when you did not agree or said they weren’t true, you should have ensured your statement was indeed factual. An excellent rebuttal of your post can be found at peacefulpeculiar.org. To sum it all up, our concerns were never addressed by the developer or city. No one from the city or developer ever tried to sit down with us and address our concerns. This goes for the people of Northpointe, along 203rd Street and Grand Oaks Farms. The developer did host a bait and switch meeting where we were supposed to be able to speak to independent third party experts but actually got sticky notes to write our questions on for them to take back and discuss before deciding what they would answer. Another point about the meeting, all of the third-party experts were either Diode employees or contractors who had signed NDA’s in hopes of landing a job and therefor couldn’t answer any of our questions or concerns. At this meeting, Brad Hardin the CEO of Diode, even stated that he had wanted to notify more than the minimum required by statue at the beginning of the project, but was told not to by the city. So, Mr. Mayor, if you want the people to ever trust you again, you must be honest with us. City staff, you also have a great deal of work to do if you want the people to trust you. Removing items from the agenda is not the answer. From where I sit it has appeared that the staff has an agenda and will do whatever it takes to get their desired result. This has included not doing any independent research and just taking the developers talking points as fact, trying to delay moving forward with items to allow for an application so the developer would be grandfathered, taking items completely off meeting agendas to prevent public comment, failures to give proper notice, and in my opinion questionable legal advice. In fact, it has been contradictory depending on which lawyer shows up. How do we heal? First, I want to thank the Aldermen. You gentlemen have taken a lot of public heat. Some of it from me but I want to thank you for the tireless and thankless work you put in for the betterment of this city and our community. Thankfully, you have heard the will of the people and have taken a stand for what is right and in the best interest of the community. You gentlemen have stood up to those who would bully you and pushed back against the staff when they have not followed your direction. It is because of you, the Aldermen, that this issue will finally be back in front of the planning and zoning commission, and we will get a public hearing on removing 'data enters' from the code book before coming back to this board for final action. That is just the first step toward healing. The cities codes need to be thoroughly reviewed, and proper setbacks and buffers need to be emplaced to prevent this from happening again when the next predatory developer comes to town. Those of us who have researched this topic would more than be willing to sit down and share the wealth of information that we have gathered and help find solutions. You need only ask. I have also heard from multiple business owners who feel disenfranchised because it appears the city does not care about them simply because they do not live within city limits despite the tax revenue the city gains from them, they do not feel as though they are represented. For many of us, this was simply the spark that lit the fire. This is not just a Peculiar issue, it's also a national issue. We will continue this fight to the state level demanding they enact statewide legislation to protect the people. There are some "good" things this has brought about. New friendships have been made. We may not agree on all things but we all do share the common goal of helping Peculiar reach its full potential. Respectfully, Scott C. Howe
1 Comment
Read More
Back to Blog
Response to Mayor9/21/2024 City of PeculiarIt has been brought to my attention that there is an effort to forward a petition asking for my removal as Mayor. All the info including WHY this is happening is in the open. There is a petition. Peculiar is designated as a fourth-class city. As a fourth-class city, the motion to impeach must come from the Aldermen. The public cannot petition to impeach, but they can petition the Aldermen to impeach. This is what we are considering. The effort appears to be organized largely by opponents (many of whom live outside of the city limits) of the formerly proposed data center. The potential effort to remove the mayor comprising of opponents of the data center is only a correlation. It is not the causation of the effort. The causation is due to the Mayor’s continued behavior of obfuscation, lack of transparency, and most-importantly procedural misconduct. His verifiable conduct towards citizens and the board of Aldermen will not go unchecked. Furthermore, he implies that those outside the city should NOT have a voice in the matter. This simply highlights the issue EVERYONE has with this mayor. When those outside the city limits voice concerns that align with those inside the city limits that helps everyone. Peculiar’s citizenry sees this too, hence the effort to remove. It is EVERYONE’S loss of liberty that is at stake with this Mayor. I have repeatedly said (publicly and to the opponents and surrounding property owners) that this project might not be right for Peculiar; but that we should at least listen to the proposal. This statement is misleading in and of itself. We DID listen to the since-retracted proposal. It was so blatantly inadequate that this whole thing blew up. The only way the developer will even submit a proposal is if we agree to light industrial zoning FIRST… and with approval for Datacenters without a special-use. This is the trap. The Mayor KNOWS the trap exists and we know he knows, and therefore we know this entire statement of his is a sham. A ruse. We are not going to be duped. We are always glad to see citizens actively engaged in the process of protecting the best interest of our city. Replay the tape. When concerns have been expressed during public discourse, these are either dismissed or shouted down. However, every time this group of citizens had a concern, the city would take it to the developer and work with them to find a solution. Still waiting… we have never seen nor heard evidence of any of potential solutions. Instead, the developer points the citizenry to their website which states these common concerns are myths that have been debunked. Nothing to see here. The problem is there are literally hundreds of impacted neighborhoods across multiple states negatively impacted by hyperscale datacenters in proximity. When a problem is so large and real and those that have already hopelessly suffered are willing to come to your aid, then these are REAL problems and not MYTHS. Upon presenting a solution back to these citizens, they would then add more concerns. Did we miss an important meeting? Still waiting on solutions to be sent back…. Many in this group had stated they were okay with the project as long as some specific concerns were addressed. When the developer agreed to comply with their concerns and find remedies; … still waiting for the proposed remedies. The developer says vote in unrestricted access to light industrial and we will then address your concerns. The phrase “Fool me once… shame on you… fool me twice… shame on me” comes to mind. We have tons of historical and empirical evidence with the hyperscale data center industry to illustrate what happens when one follows the “trust me” model. The developer said as much. Remember the “we need a leash” comment? The Mayor knows this too. Treating the citizenry for fools gets one unelected. the group began to spread misinformation about the project. As stated MANY times, keeping citizenry in the dark or shouting them down when uncomfortable questions are asked, leads to people filling in the gaps on their own. Amazing how many times ‘misinformation’ turns out to be true in hindsight. This group made false statements regarding tax abatements and the number of years that those might be. All of this was still in the negotiation process; an official proposal for tax abatement had yet to be brought before the board. Answer these questions without hiding behind an NDA shield: What are the minimums you are willing to settle on behalf of your citizenry, in terms of abatements, number of years, etc.. in order toaccept any developer’s proposal? How are you going to enforce these minimums? … still waiting Have you spoken to cohort governments to see how well hyperscaledata center agreements have paid off? Why are early-adopter states rewriting their laws because the seduction of “hundreds of millions of dollars in revenue” have not materialized, but the vast drain of resources has? The big question: Why do you need to have Light industrial approved before negotiating? This project could have potentially meant hundreds of millions of dollars in revenue to the city, the school district, the fire district and the county. The city could have used these funds to build a police station, improve our roads and other infrastructure and improve parks (like ball fields at Dunsworth Park). Finally, it could have served to pay down water & sewer bonds, reducing the burden on all of our tax paying residents. Each sentence includes a “could have.” Change this to a “will be guaranteed to…” and you might have something to discuss. “Could have” doesn’t cut it. Finally, it could have served to pay down water & sewer bonds, reducing the burden on all of our tax paying residents. This sounds familiar. Looking back several years ago a negotiation was made concerning our source of water. On paper it must have sounded good, but reality follows the law of unintended consequences: We now have the highest water rates IN THE COUNTRY (PWSD #2 just went up another 8.5% by the way) and an energy bill increase of 17%. Follow the path of hyperscale data centers nationally and you will observe this same trend. …so when you say you “could have” a reduced burden on our tax paying residents now you know what we hear. Unfortunately, we were never allowed to get to that point in the negotiations. The developer was never able to officially submit a proposal to the city with all of the factual, fully negotiated parameters in place. You were allowed, you weren’t willing … and neither was the developer. Show us, the impacted public what you have. Don’t hide behind an NDA. Don’t Myth-bust actual concerns, and then decide whether a hyperscale data center is appropriate for a light industrial next to residential areas BEFORE APPROVING FOR USE. But the Mayor already knows these things. The Alderman felt the pressure from this boisterous and ill-informed group and requested to remove data centers as an allowable use in the light industrial zoning class, essentially killing this project. Why would it kill the project? It is NOT light industrial. You know it, the Hyperscale data center industry knows it, and we know it. The aldermen did their homework. They know it too. This area has been master planned for light industrial for almost 10 years. Right. Keep it that way. I've always believed in, and supported this town. This project might have had the ability to help this community in areas of great need. This development might have propelled our city forward; or the developer's ask may have been too great, and turning it down was the best option. Unfortunately, we'll just never know. Here you go with the “might haves” again. Rising water and energy rates, mismanaging meetings, shutting down discussions with citizenry and aldermen… perhaps it is time to consider a motion for Peculiar to become a third-class city and bring more governance through Commissioners and less through a Mayor only. The Kansas City Area Development Council (KCADC) has made it clear that this very public debacle has damaged our city's reputation and our ability to attract good, positive developments in the immediate future. Nope. This very public debacle has bolstered this city’s reputation letting big corporations know that we will not just lay down and give them the city. It is OUR city and we will tell you what you can and cannot do here. If you have any questions that you want to ask me, please contact me and I will tell you honestly what I know as facts. I appreciate your support. Yeah right. Brian Lincoln
Back to Blog
Neighborhood Takeover8/24/2024 In 1957, some 13 homes existed on a private street in the Roppolo subdivision in unincorporated Elk Grove Township along with the Dierking family farm all near Chicago. That farm included a three-story farmhouse moved from near what would become O’Hare International Airport after World War II.
The neighborhood grew to 55 homes between Higgins and Landmeier roads just east of Busse Road and enjoyed a peaceful existence for the next 65 years. Texas-based Stream Data Centers purchased all 55 homes in the Roppolo subdivision in late 2023 and began razing them in February to make way for a three-building, 2.1 million sq. ft. data center campus.
Back to Blog
Noise & More8/21/2024 Many individuals agree that if you try and negotiate with these big corporations and they get their foot in the door, you will have difficulty controlling them. They will submit variance after variance and sue the town until they get what they want. This is why they prey on small towns.
In other words, we want to avoid negotiating with these predators. They hope the Council and Planning Commission and the Town Lawyer are incompetent and will fall for their tricks. I have faith that this will not happen in our town and that you will do all it takes to protect this town. Chesterton was smart and protected their residents. In the meantime, I also wanted to highlight some concerning quotes from the article below. According to former NASA Scientist Dr. John Lyver, residents, students, and teachers as far as 2.5 miles could be affected. --- • Former NASA Scientist Dr. John Lyver and Heritage Hunt resident believe this would be a mistake. He conducted a noise study on the proposed and existing data centers, analyzing the way noise travels through the air and over the topography. • Last week, Lyver released an updated version of his study and findings. It shows sound radiating from data centers would reach sound levels that would violate the county sound ordinance of 55-60 decibels, thus disrupting the peace. However, HVAC systems are currently exempt from such ordinances in Prince William County. • Among multitudes of concerns surrounding data centers, noise pollution has emerged as the most concerning. Data center HVAC systems produce a low hum, which the brain has difficulty filtering out. Lyver contends that so many large data buildings all within close proximity would amplify the sound. That level of sound could travel as far as 2.5 miles. • People living near data centers, such as those in Chandler, Arizona claim to experience health problems, stress, and difficulty sleeping. Constant noise has negative effects on the body even in other forms such as construction sound, which could go on for 10-20 years as data centers are being built in the area. • Containing sound is not an easy or inexpensive fix (which is the reason data centers are reluctant to handle the problem on their end.) Protecting classrooms at Chris Yung Elementary School could cost an estimated $20 million, according to Dr. Lyver's research. • These levels of noise will impact student learning in three ways: • excessive noise in the classroom will disrupt the quality of learning, • a vital part of a rounded education is for students to play, learn, and interact outside the school building in learning and physical activities, • and stress-induced health issues in children and school staff personnel.
Back to Blog
The Cloud Is Not Silent8/15/2024 This excerpt was taken from a scientific article, "Popular Science" "Inside the physical footprint of the Cloud." It describes the noise pollution factor on members of the community who live close to a Hyperscale Datacenter. Its a bit wordy, but very informative, and honestly a bit scary. I realize the need for datacenters, but as this article stresses, NOT NEAR residential areas, and certainly should not be a mile from a school. Dear Peculiar Board Members and Staff, please read this, and tell me how you would justify that money is more important than lives. Over vast distances, the sonic exhaust of our digital lives reverberates: the minute vibrations of hard disks, the rumbling of air chillers, the cranking of diesel generators, the mechanical spinning of fans. Data centers emit acoustic waste, what environmentalists call “noise pollution.” For communities like Brenda’s and David’s, the computational whir of data centers is not merely an annoyance, but a source of mental and physical harm. Brenda, a nurse by training, reported an uptick in her blood pressure and cortisol levels with the onset of the noise. David, a twenty-something software engineer, was diagnosed with hypertension, and meets frequently with a clinical therapist to manage the anxiety caused by the data center’s hum. Their stories are cautionary tales; they are neither uncommon nor exceptional. The acute and longitudinal physiological effects of industrial noise pollution are well-documented to include hearing loss, elevated stress hormones like cortisol, hypertension, and insomnia. Brenda and David met with other disaffected residents in their respective communities to organize for change. Brenda soon joined the Dobson Noise Coalition, helping to organize a community meeting with her neighbors, city officials, state and federal representatives, and employees of CyrusOne, the offending data center. David took a stand with others in his building, successfully mobilizing the Chicago Department of Public Health to file a noise complaint on their behalf and successfully obtain a hearing for a noise pollution violation. While the efforts of these communities to minimize the noise pollution harming them are ongoing, they are resigned to modest goals to improve rather than solve the problem. Unlike other industries, data centers are largely self-regulating: There is no sweeping federal agency to govern the siting and operation of new and existing facilities. Because data center noise is unregulated by political authorities, facilities can be built in close proximity to residential communities. Given the subjective nature of hearing, the history of noise regulation might best be characterized by a series of contests over expertise and the “right” to quiet, as codified in liberal legal regimes. Over the course of my fieldwork with the communities of Chandler and Printer’s Row, I learned that the “noise” of the Cloud uniquely eludes regulatory schemes. In many cases, the loudness of the data centers, as measured in decibels (dB), falls below the threshold of intolerance as prescribed by local ordinances. For this reason, when residents contacted the authorities to intervene, to attenuate or quiet their noise, no action was taken, because the data centers had not technically violated the law, and their properties were zoned for industrial purposes. However, upon closer interrogation of the sound, some residents reported that the monotonal drone, a frequency hovering within the range of human speech, is particularly disturbing, given the attuned sensitivity of human ears to discern such frequencies above others. Even so, there were days when the data centers, running diesel generators, vastly exceeded permissible decibel-thresholds for noise. As with water and carbon, local companies like CyrusOne pledged in community meetings to take steps to attenuate their sound, though these were unenforceable promises that, to date, they have failed to keep.
Back to Blog
Massive Industrial Complex8/15/2024
Most of the light green and purple areas on this map will become HYPERSCALE Data Centers. How about people on Knight road and YY, and Mullen Road. Let this get in and you too will have a data center/dump in your back yard or front...
Back to Blog
It's NOT just Peculiar8/12/2024 Here’s a story from Gallatin, Tenn shared with me by a resident. The plans for their data center began in 2017 and residents learned about it in 2020. She said they used a code name so residents weren’t really aware of what was happening. It was too late by the time they knew what was really going on.
This resident purchased 11 acres, not near the data center. They met with the electric company and were assured that power poles would not be placed near their new home build. A year later, the electric company put poles feet from their new home. They were never informed of the changes. She said they should’ve sold their land before building but were deceived.
Back to Blog
Power is the key8/11/2024 ●Start connecting the Dots.
POWER Plant next to Diode Hyper-Scale Data Center, Transmission lines every which way, looking for upward of 1GW of power for Hyper-Scale Centers in Peculiar. These are HUGE facilities that will consume Peculiar. ●NO Hyper-Scale Data Centers● Anywhere Near Residential Neighborhoods. Hyper-Scale are not Light Industrial. ●No Gas Fired Power plants● Near Residential homes, schools. If Peculiar and Cass County property owners and Citizens don't start Getting Organized and involved, We are going to get sold out to BiG Tech And Big energy companies. If you haven't yet, Give your County Commissioners a call and Email to let them hear your concerns. They seem to think this is Just a Peculiar issue. Solar, Wind farms, Hyper-Scale Data Centers, Power Plants. Zero or out dated Regulations To protect our quality of Life, Our property values, Our Kids future. Noise polution Health impacts, Set-backs, Buffer zones, and Zoning doesn't exist to the extent for protecting the Community and Citizens These things need a big 1-mile buffer zone like a land fill.. They look More like a prison. Aquila 2.0 17% increase to our base rate from Evergy West Starting Jan 1, 2025 Who's paying for Data centers power?
Back to Blog
Public Testimony7/31/2024 Testimony at Missouri Public Service Commission and Evergy Public Hearing regarding the 17% base rate increase to Missouri West Evergy district. I am asking specifically of the 340,000 customers of the Evergy MO West district,
1.What percentage of power usage available today and in the next 5 years is specifically identified for the Massive power usage of Hyper-Scale Data center. 2. What portion of available or future growth is baked into the 17% price increase is caused by demand of Hyper-Scale Data Centers. How much of the cost of infustructure is the Hyper-Scale end user paying for? 3. What is the load Usage in Megawatts demand of current Hyper-Scale and forecasted New Hyper-Scale Data centers in Missouri West. 5. What is the view of Eminent Domain and unfair compensation to impacted citizens for infustructure and power demands place on or next to their property. Projections for Diodes and future Hyper-Scale in Peculiar are upward of 900Megwatt of power. That equivalent to 750,000 customers. Ultimately, Multi-Billion dollar companies need to pay for the infustructure and expanded demand vs the 340,000 existing customers bearing those costs. Regardless of where a Hyper-Scale Data center is located in Cass County.
Back to Blog
Noise Complaints7/13/2024 Have you ever heared these same excuses or claims from Diode Ventures, Peculiar City administrator or Mayor? This will be be all of US if we let these HYPER-SCALE Data centers be built near our homes. The City Zoning codes doesn't protect from this. 75db is what Peculiar is going to allow. It's time to say No to Hyper-Scale development in Peculiar. |